跳到主要内容

Testing

警告

本页内容可能已经过时。
今后会进行更新，但目前您可能需要参考侧边栏顶部的内容（介绍/要点/应用案例/......）。

For any medium to large-scale applications, it is critical to test the application.

To successfully test our application, we will want the following things:

  • No state should be preserved between test/testWidgets.
    That means no global state in the application, or all global states should reset after each test.

  • Being able to force our providers to have a specific state, either through mocking or by manipulating them until we reach the desired state.

Let's see one by one how Riverpod helps you with these.

No state should be preserved between test/testWidgets.​

Since providers are usually declared as global variables, you might worry about that one.
After all, global state makes testing very difficult, because it can require lengthy setUp/tearDown.

But the reality is: While providers are declared as globals, the state of a provider is not global.

Instead, it is stored in an object named ProviderContainer, which you may have seen if you looked at the dart-only examples.
If you haven't, know that this ProviderContainer object is implicitly created by ProviderScope, the widget that enables Riverpod on our project.

Concretely what this means is, two testWidgets using providers do not share any state.
As such, there is no need for any setUp/tearDown at all.

But an example is better than lengthy explanations:


// A Counter implemented and tested using Flutter

// We declared a provider globally, and we will use it in two tests, to see
// if the state correctly resets to `0` between tests.

final counterProvider = StateProvider((ref) => 0);

// Renders the current state and a button that allows incrementing the state
class MyApp extends StatelessWidget {
  @override
  Widget build(BuildContext context) {
    return MaterialApp(
      home: Consumer(builder: (context, ref, _) {
        final counter = ref.watch(counterProvider);
        return ElevatedButton(
          onPressed: () => ref.read(counterProvider.notifier).state++,
          child: Text('$counter'),
        );
      }),
    );
  }
}

void main() {
  testWidgets('update the UI when incrementing the state', (tester) async {
    await tester.pumpWidget(ProviderScope(child: MyApp()));

    // The default value is `0`, as declared in our provider
    expect(find.text('0'), findsOneWidget);
    expect(find.text('1'), findsNothing);

    // Increment the state and re-render
    await tester.tap(find.byType(ElevatedButton));
    await tester.pump();

    // The state have properly incremented
    expect(find.text('1'), findsOneWidget);
    expect(find.text('0'), findsNothing);
  });

  testWidgets('the counter state is not shared between tests', (tester) async {
    await tester.pumpWidget(ProviderScope(child: MyApp()));

    // The state is `0` once again, with no tearDown/setUp needed
    expect(find.text('0'), findsOneWidget);
    expect(find.text('1'), findsNothing);
  });
}

As you can see, while counterProvider was declared as a global, no state was shared between tests.
As such, we do not have to worry about our tests potentially behaving differently if executed in a different order, since they are running in complete isolation.

Overriding the behavior of a provider during tests.​

A common real-world application may have the following objects:

  • It will have a Repository class, which provides a type-safe and simple API to perform HTTP requests.

  • An object that manages the application state, and may use Repository to perform HTTP requests based on different factors. This may be a ChangeNotifier, Bloc, or even a provider.

Using Riverpod, this may be represented as follows:


class Repository {
  Future<List<Todo>> fetchTodos() async => [];
}

// We expose our instance of Repository in a provider
final repositoryProvider = Provider((ref) => Repository());

/// The list of todos. Here, we are simply fetching them from the server using
/// [Repository] and doing nothing else.
final todoListProvider = FutureProvider((ref) async {
  // Obtains the Repository instance
  final repository = ref.watch(repositoryProvider);

  // Fetch the todos and expose them to the UI.
  return repository.fetchTodos();
});

In this situation, when making a unit/widget test, we will typically want to replace our Repository instance with a fake implementation that returns a pre-defined response instead of making a real HTTP request.

We will then want our todoListProvider or equivalent to use the mocked implementation of Repository.

To achieve this, we can use the overrides parameter of ProviderScope/ProviderContainer to override the behavior of repositoryProvider:


testWidgets('override repositoryProvider', (tester) async {
  await tester.pumpWidget(
    ProviderScope(
      overrides: [
        // Override the behavior of repositoryProvider to return
        // FakeRepository instead of Repository.
        repositoryProvider.overrideWithValue(FakeRepository())
        // We do not have to override `todoListProvider`, it will automatically
        // use the overridden repositoryProvider
      ],
      child: MyApp(),
    ),
  );
});

As you can see by the highlighted code, ProviderScope/ProviderContainer allows replacing the implementation of a provider with a different behavior.

信息

Some providers expose simplified ways to override their behavior.
For example, FutureProvider allows overriding the provider with an AsyncValue:


final todoListProvider = FutureProvider((ref) async => <Todo>[]);
// ...
/* SKIP */
final foo =
/* SKIP END */
    ProviderScope(
  overrides: [
    /// Allows overriding a FutureProvider to return a fixed value
    todoListProvider.overrideWithValue(
      AsyncValue.data([Todo(id: '42', label: 'Hello', completed: true)]),
    ),
  ],
  child: const MyApp(),
);

Note: As part of the 2.0.0 release, overrideWithValue methods are temporarily removed. They will be added back in later versions.

信息

The syntax for overriding a provider with the family modifier is slightly different.

If you used a provider like this:

final response = ref.watch(myProvider('12345'));

You could override the provider as:

myProvider('12345').overrideWithValue(...));

Full widget test example​

Wrapping up, here is the entire full code for our Flutter test.


import 'package:flutter/material.dart';
import 'package:flutter_riverpod/flutter_riverpod.dart';
import 'package:flutter_test/flutter_test.dart';

class Repository {
  Future<List<Todo>> fetchTodos() async => [];
}

class Todo {
  Todo({
    required this.id,
    required this.label,
    required this.completed,
  });

  final String id;
  final String label;
  final bool completed;
}

// We expose our instance of Repository in a provider
final repositoryProvider = Provider((ref) => Repository());

/// The list of todos. Here, we are simply fetching them from the server using
/// [Repository] and doing nothing else.
final todoListProvider = FutureProvider((ref) async {
  // Obtains the Repository instance
  final repository = ref.read(repositoryProvider);

  // Fetch the todos and expose them to the UI.
  return repository.fetchTodos();
});

/// A mocked implementation of Repository that returns a pre-defined list of todos
class FakeRepository implements Repository {
  @override
  Future<List<Todo>> fetchTodos() async {
    return [
      Todo(id: '42', label: 'Hello world', completed: false),
    ];
  }
}

class TodoItem extends StatelessWidget {
  const TodoItem({super.key, required this.todo});
  final Todo todo;
  @override
  Widget build(BuildContext context) {
    return Text(todo.label);
  }
}

void main() {
  testWidgets('override repositoryProvider', (tester) async {
    await tester.pumpWidget(
      ProviderScope(
        overrides: [
          repositoryProvider.overrideWithValue(FakeRepository())
        ],
        // Our application, which will read from todoListProvider to display the todo-list.
        // You may extract this into a MyApp widget
        child: MaterialApp(
          home: Scaffold(
            body: Consumer(builder: (context, ref, _) {
              final todos = ref.watch(todoListProvider);
              // The list of todos is loading or in error
              if (todos.asData == null) {
                return const CircularProgressIndicator();
              }
              return ListView(
                children: [
                  for (final todo in todos.asData!.value) TodoItem(todo: todo)
                ],
              );
            }),
          ),
        ),
      ),
    );

    // The first frame is a loading state.
    expect(find.byType(CircularProgressIndicator), findsOneWidget);

    // Re-render. TodoListProvider should have finished fetching the todos by now
    await tester.pump();

    // No longer loading
    expect(find.byType(CircularProgressIndicator), findsNothing);

    // Rendered one TodoItem with the data returned by FakeRepository
    expect(tester.widgetList(find.byType(TodoItem)), [
      isA<TodoItem>()
          .having((s) => s.todo.id, 'todo.id', '42')
          .having((s) => s.todo.label, 'todo.label', 'Hello world')
          .having((s) => s.todo.completed, 'todo.completed', false),
    ]);
  });
}